TRI-SCORE and benefit of intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation - Université de Picardie Jules Verne Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue European Heart Journal Année : 2023

TRI-SCORE and benefit of intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation

Julien Dreyfus
  • Fonction : Auteur correspondant
  • PersonId : 1078715

Connectez-vous pour contacter l'auteur
Xavier Galloo
Christos Iliadis
  • Fonction : Auteur
Giulio Russo
Yan Topilsky
Marcel Weber
  • Fonction : Auteur
Luis Nombela-Franco
Alessandra Sala
  • Fonction : Auteur
Andrea Eixerés-Esteve
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jean-François Obadia
  • Fonction : Auteur
Rodrigo Estevez Loureiro
  • Fonction : Auteur
Jörg Hausleiter
Luigi Badano
  • Fonction : Auteur
Thomas Modine
  • Fonction : Auteur
Azeem Latib
  • Fonction : Auteur
Fabien Praz
Stephan Windecker
Jose Luis Zamorano
  • Fonction : Auteur
Ralph Stephan von Bardeleben
  • Fonction : Auteur
Gilbert Tang
  • Fonction : Auteur
Rebecca Hahn
  • Fonction : Auteur
John Webb
  • Fonction : Auteur
Denisa Muraru
  • Fonction : Auteur
Mohammed Nejjari
Vincent Chan
Michele de Bonis
Manuel Carnero-Alcazar
Georg Nickenig
  • Fonction : Auteur
Roman Pfister
Volker Rudolph
Juan Crestanello
  • Fonction : Auteur
Philipp Lurz
Philipp Bartko
  • Fonction : Auteur

Résumé

Background and aims: Benefit of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) correction and timing of intervention are unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates after surgical or transcatheter intervention to conservative management according to TR clinical stage as assessed using the TRI-SCORE. Methods: 2,413 patients with severe isolated functional TR were enrolled in TRIGISTRY (1217 conservatively managed, 551 isolated tricuspid valve surgery and 645 transcatheter valve repair). The primary endpoint was survival at 2 years. Results: The TRI-SCORE was low (≤3) in 32%, intermediate (4-5) in 33% and high (≥6) in 35%. A successful correction was achieved in 97% and 65% of patients in the surgical and transcatheter groups, respectively. Survival rates decreased with the TRI-SCORE in the three treatment groups (all P < 0.0001). In the low TRI-SCORE category, survival rates were higher in the surgical and transcatheter groups than in the conservative management group (93%, 87% and 79%, respectively; P = 0.0002). In the intermediate category, no significant difference between groups was observed overall (80%, 71% and 71%, respectively; P = 0.13) but benefit of the intervention became significant when the analysis was restricted to patients with successful correction (80%, 81% and 71%, respectively; P = 0.009). In the high TRI-SCORE category, survival was similar between groups even when restricted to patients with successful correction (61%, 68% and 58% respectively, P = 0.08). Conclusion: Survival progressively decreased with the TRI-SCORE irrespective of treatment modality. Compared to conservative management, an early and successful surgical or transcatheter intervention improved 2-year survival in patients at low and, to a lower extent, intermediate TRI-SCORE, while no benefit was observed in the high TRI-SCORE category.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Dreyfus et al-2023-TRI-SCORE and benefit of intervention in patients with severe tricuspid.pdf (944.22 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
ehad585_supplementary_data.zip (136.18 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origine : Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Dates et versions

hal-04192875 , version 1 (15-09-2023)

Licence

Paternité - Pas d'utilisation commerciale

Identifiants

Citer

Julien Dreyfus, Xavier Galloo, Maurizio Taramasso, Gregor Heitzinger, Giovanni Benfari, et al.. TRI-SCORE and benefit of intervention in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. European Heart Journal, 2023, pp.ehad585. ⟨10.1093/eurheartj/ehad585⟩. ⟨hal-04192875⟩
56 Consultations
15 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More