Acceptance Factors for In-Hospital Pharmacist Interventions in Daily Practice: A Retrospective Study - Université de Picardie Jules Verne Accéder directement au contenu
Article Dans Une Revue FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY Année : 2022

Acceptance Factors for In-Hospital Pharmacist Interventions in Daily Practice: A Retrospective Study

Résumé

Introduction: Performing pharmacist interventions (PIs) during the medication review helps to improve the quality of care. The acceptance by the physician of these PIs is a good indicator of the quality of this clinical pharmacy activity. The objective of this study was to determine, in the Amiens-Picardie teaching hospital (France), factors of acceptance in a variable environment of activity (central pharmacy, in the care units, computer assisted).Methods: All PIs transcribed by pharmacists on the Act-IP (c) site between November 2018 and April 2019 were analyzed using a complementary search in patient records. The environment, type, and clinical impact on patient health of each PI was collected. Linear mixed-effects models with a random pharmacist intercept were used to investigate the relationship between PI modalities and their chance of being accepted.Results: A total of 3,100 PIs were traced, of which 2,930 had been followed over time. Of these, 2,930 PIs, 1,504 (51.3%) were performed by a postgraduate pharmacist and 1,426 (48.7%) by a pharmacy resident, 1,623 (55.4%) were performed by verbal exchange, 455 (15.5%) by telephone, 846 (28.9%) by computer software, and 6 (0.2%) by paper. The clinical impact on patient health was major for 976 PIs (33.3%) and vital for 26 PIs (0.9%). According to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC), they were mainly related to anti-infectives (30.3%), the nervous system (18.7%), and blood and blood-forming organs (17.3%). In total, 2,415 PIs (82.4%) were accepted. According to the multivariate model, a PI was more often accepted when it was transmitted orally rather than by software (+27.7%, 95% CI: +23.2 to +32.1%) and when it was transmitted to a medical resident rather than a postgraduate physician (+4.4%, 95% CI: 1.2-7.6%). In these cases, there was a major rather than a moderate clinical impact on patient health (+4.3%, 95% CI: +1.1-+7.6%).Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of the quality of the exchange with the prescriber and the prioritization of high-risk interventions as key points of medication review to improve rate of pharmacist interventions accepted by physician.

Dates et versions

hal-04139786 , version 1 (23-06-2023)

Identifiants

Citer

Amaury Durand, André Gillibert, Sophie Membre, Lisa Mondet, Aurélie Lenglet, et al.. Acceptance Factors for In-Hospital Pharmacist Interventions in Daily Practice: A Retrospective Study. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13, ⟨10.3389/fphar.2022.811289⟩. ⟨hal-04139786⟩
18 Consultations
0 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More